Lev 13:10-20 | NETfull | STEP | The priest will then examine it, and if a white swelling is on the skin, it has turned the hair white, and there is raw flesh in the swelling,

Leviticus 13:10-20

10 The priest will then examine it, ^{▼▼ Heb “and the priest shall see.” The pronoun “it” is unexpressed, but it should be assumed and it refers to the infection (cf. the note on v. 8 above).} and if ^{▼▼ Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV).} a white swelling is on the skin, it has turned the hair white, and there is raw flesh in the swelling, ^{▼▼ Heb “and rawness [i.e., something living] of living flesh is in the swelling”; KJV, NASB, NRSV “quick raw flesh.”} 11 it is a chronic ^{▼▼ The term rendered here “chronic” is a Niphal participle meaning “grown old” (HALOT 448 s.v. II ישׁן nif.2). The idea is that this is an old enduring skin disease that keeps on developing or recurring.} disease on the skin of his body, ^{▼▼ Heb “in the skin of his flesh” as opposed to the head or the beard (v. 29; cf. v. 2 above).} so the priest is to pronounce him unclean. ^{▼▼ This is the declarative Piel of the verb טָמֵא (tame’, cf. the note on v. 3 above).} The priest ^{▼▼ Heb “he”; the referent (the priest) has been specified in the translation for clarity.} must not merely quarantine him, for he is unclean. ^{▼▼ Instead of just the normal quarantine isolation, this condition calls for the more drastic and enduring response stated in Lev 13:45–46. Raw flesh, of course, sometimes oozes blood to one degree or another, and blood flows are by nature impure (see, e.g., Lev 12 and 15; cf. J. E. Hartley, Leviticus [WBC], 191).} 12 If, however, the disease breaks out ^{▼▼ Heb “And if spreading [infinitive absolute] it spreads out [finite verb].” For the infinitive absolute used to highlight contrast rather than emphasis see GKC 343 #113.p.} on the skin so that the disease covers all the skin of the person with the infection ^{▼▼ Heb “all the skin of the infection,” but see v. 4 above.} from his head to his feet, as far as the priest can see, ^{▼▼ Heb “to all the appearance of the eyes of the priest.”} 13 the priest must then examine it, ^{▼▼ Heb “and the priest shall see.” The pronoun “it” is unexpressed, but it should be assumed and it refers to the infection (cf. the note on v. 8 above).} and if ^{▼▼ Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV, NASB).} the disease covers his whole body, he is to pronounce the person with the infection clean. ^{▼▼ Heb “he shall pronounce the infection clean,” but see v. 4 above. Also, this is another use of the declarative Piel of the verb טָהֵר (taher; cf. the note on v. 6 above).} He has turned all white, so he is clean. ^{▼▼ Heb “all of him has turned white, and he is clean.”} 14 But whenever raw flesh appears in it ^{▼▼ Heb “and in the day of there appears in it living flesh.” Some English versions render this as “open sores” (cf. NCV, TEV, NLT).} he will be unclean, 15 so the priest is to examine the raw flesh ^{▼▼ Heb “and the priest shall see the living flesh.”} and pronounce him unclean ^{▼▼ This is the declarative Piel of the verb טָמֵא (tame’; cf. the note on v. 3 above).} – it is diseased. 16 If, however, ^{▼▼ Heb “Or if/when.”} the raw flesh once again turns white, ^{▼▼ Heb “the living flesh returns and is turned/changed to white.” The Hebrew verb “returns” is שׁוּב (shuv), which often functions adverbially when combined with a second verb as it is here (cf. “and is turned”) and, in such cases, is usually rendered “again” (see, e.g., GKC 386-87 #120.g). Another suggestion is that here שׁוּב means “to recede” (cf., e.g., 2 Kgs 20:9), so one could translate “the raw flesh recedes and turns white.” This would mean that the new “white” skin “has grown over” the raw flesh (B. A. Levine, Leviticus [JPSTC], 79).} then he must come to the priest. 17 The priest will then examine it, ^{▼▼ Heb “and the priest shall see it.”} and if ^{▼▼ Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV, NASB).} the infection has turned white, the priest is to pronounce the person with the infection clean ^{▼▼ Heb “the priest shall pronounce the infection clean,” but see v. 4 above. Also, this is another use of the declarative Piel of the verb טָהֵר (taher, cf. the note on v. 6 above).} – he is clean.

A Boil on the Skin

18 “When someone’s body has a boil on its skin ^{▼▼ Heb (MT) reads, “And flesh if/when there is in it, in its skin, a boil.” Smr has only “in it,” not “in its skin,” and a few medieval Hebrew mss as well as the LXX, Syriac, and Vulgate have only “in its skin” (cf. v. 24 below), not “in it.” It does not effect the meaning of the verse, but one is tempted to suggest that “in it” (בוֹ, vo) was added in error as a partial dittography from the beginning of “in its skin” (בְעֹרוֹ, v^e’oro).} and it heals, 19 and in the place of the boil there is a white swelling or a reddish white bright spot, he must show himself to the priest. ^{▼▼ Some English versions translate “it shall be shown to [or “be seen by”] the priest,” taking the infection to be the subject of the verb (e.g., KJV, NASB, RSV, NRSV). Based on the Hebrew grammar there is no way to be sure which is intended.} 20 The priest will then examine it, ^{▼▼ Heb “and the priest shall see.” The pronoun “it” is unexpressed, but it should be assumed and it refers to the infection (cf. the note on v. 8 above).} and if ^{▼▼ Heb “and behold.”} it appears to be deeper than the skin ^{▼▼ Heb “and behold its appearance is low (שָׁפָל, shafal) ‘from’ (comparative מִן, min, “lower than”) the skin.” Compare “deeper” in v. 3 above where, however, a different word is used (עָמֹק, ’amoq), and see the note on “swelling” in v. 1 above (cf. J. E. Hartley, Leviticus [WBC], 192; note that, contrary to the MT, Tg. Onq. has עָמֹק in this verse as well as v. 4). The alternation of these two terms (i.e., “deeper” and “lower”) in vv. 25–26 below shows that they both refer to the same phenomenon. Some have argued that “this sore was lower than the surrounding skin” (J. Milgrom, Leviticus [AB], 1:773, 788), in which case “swelling” would be an inappropriate translation of שְׂאֵת (s^e’et) in v. 19. It seems unlikely, however, that the surface of a “boil” would sink below the surface of the surrounding skin. The infectious pus etc. that makes up a boil normally causes swelling.} and its hair has turned white, then the priest is to pronounce the person unclean. ^{▼▼ The declarative Piel of the verb טָמֵא (tame’, cf. the note on v. 3 above).} It is a diseased infection that has broken out in the boil. ^{▼▼ Heb “It is an infection of disease. In the boil it has broken out.” For the rendering “diseased infection” see the note on v. 2 above.}