Amos 3:3-6

3 Do two walk together without having met?
The rhetorical questions in vv. 3–5 expect the answer, “No, of course not!” Those in v. 6 anticipate the answer, “Yes, of course they do/he is.” They all draw attention to the principle of cause and effect and lay the logical foundation for the argument in vv. 7–8. Also note the progression from a general question in v. 3 to the “meetings” of two animals (v. 4), to that of an animal and a human trap (v. 5), to a climax with the confrontation with the Lord (v. 6). Each of these meetings is disastrous.

4 Does a lion roar in the woods if he has not cornered his prey?
Heb “without having prey [or “food”].”

Does a young lion bellow from his den if he has not caught something?
5 Does a bird swoop down into a trap on the ground if there is no bait?
Does a trap spring up from the ground unless it has surely caught something?
6 If an alarm sounds
Heb “If the ram’s horn is blown.”
in a city, do people not fear?
Or “tremble” (NASB, NIV, NCV); or “shake.”

If disaster overtakes a
Heb “is in”; NIV, NCV, NLT “comes to.”
city, is the Lord not responsible?
Heb “has the Lord not acted?”

Copyright information for NETfull