Job 6:2-3 | KingComments | STEP | Job always responds to the previous speaker, but it is clear that he recognizes a common trait in the attitude of each of them. He always answers the friends together – he speaks of “you” (plural) – and not individually. The similarity between Job’s first answer here and his complaint in Job 3 is remarkable. However, in his reply to Eliphaz, he is more controlled. He also elaborates on more things. But the burden is the same and also here he expresses his longing for death. There is no trace of hope. This first answer, which includes Job 6-7, is divided into two parts. In Job 6 he addresses his friends, first making a general complaint ( ), without addressing the three friends directly. In Job 7 he speaks to God. The answer can be divided as follows: 1. The heaviness and reality of his suffering ( ). 2. The desire to be killed by God ( ). 3. The uselessness of his friends ( ). 4. He challenges his friends to test him ( ). 5. The brevity of life ( ). 6. God is his enemy ( ). 7. His appeal in view of sin ( ). Despite all the falsehood hidden behind Eliphaz’s right words, Job has allowed him to finish speaking, and has not interrupted him. When Eliphaz has come to the end of his speech, assured that nothing can be said against it, it turns out that Job is far from convinced. Job’s reaction is introduced with the words “then Job answered” ( ). These words are the introduction of Job’s reply to the speech of one of the friends each time. Job answers, although he does not address Eliphaz directly in his reaction here. Eliphaz has reproached Job for succumbing to his suffering ( ). In response, Job asks that his grief should be actually weighed, i.e. taken seriously ( ). Eliphaz says it so easily, but he is not affected by what was done to Job. A great amount of misery has come upon him that cannot be expressed in weight. He has been buried under it. One after the other misery has fallen upon him. It should be put together in the balances. The picture here is of a balance with two scales. On one of them, the misery and suffering of Job are piled up. Job shows its great collective weight. All his accumulated misery is heavier than the sand of the seas ( ). Is it any wonder, then, that the heaviness of his suffering has led him to ill-considered statements? It sounds like an apology, because he did not make incorrect or rash statements. But is it not the case that this can happen to anyone who suffers great suffering? We will have to learn to understand such ill-considered statements and not give our cold judgment about them. At the same time, we may think of a man who has also suffered enormously, but speaks of this as “momentary, light affliction”. He was able to do so because he saw “an eternal weight of glory far beyond all comparison” ( ). Paul, for he says this, saw the glorified Lord above the circumstances. Job does not know this. For the Lord Jesus it is even more true that He was looking at the joy set before Him ( ). There is something even more important to Job than physical suffering, and that is the awareness of the arrows of God, “the Almighty”, that hit him ( ; cf. ). Arrows cause intense, burning pain. He feels he is the target of the Almighty, against Whom no one can stand. This is the first time that Job blames God for his suffering ( ). There is no other option for him than to drink “their poison” with his spirit. This is how he experiences what God is doing to him. God is his enemy Who arrays the misery that has come upon him as an ordered army against him. What can he do about it? God is so powerful, so capable of arraying His horrors. No resistance is possible against that. We know that Job’s view of God is wrong, but Job does not know what we may know and can know ( ; ). He does not know God as his loving Father. But even though we know this, we sometimes forget it. When our circumstances fill our field of vision, we don’t rise above them. Only if we can focus our eye on the glorified Christ and the loving Father heart it is possible to glory in tribulation ( ). In pictorial language, Job points out what some animals let hear when they eat, or better what they don’t let hear when they eat. An animal – a “wild donkey”, or an “ox” – that gets good food is satisfied, you don’t hear it ( ). Job, however, is served disasters on the dinner table of his life, and this in a very varied composition. How could he be satisfied with that and be quiet! After all, you don’t eat disgusting food without grumbling. Job cannot see his suffering or the words of his friends as pleasant food. If it were tasty food, he would not complain. But what is placed before him is an extraordinarily tasteless menu ( ). “The white of an egg” can also be translated as “a disgusting tasting slime of a certain plant”. It’s not attractive in any way. It lacks ingredients that would make it tasty and edible. He refuses to touch that menu, let alone eat it ( ). Just the sight of it makes him sick. Job just refuses to live such a life. Here, Job does not speak the language of faith, that is to say of confidence, as we see, for example, in Paul. Paul was well pleased with what happened to him in insults and suffering for Christ ( ). Job needs light and must learn to trust God, even where he cannot understand Him. We, at least most of us, have to learn that as well.

‏ Job 6:2-3

Introduction

Job always responds to the previous speaker, but it is clear that he recognizes a common trait in the attitude of each of them. He always answers the friends together – he speaks of “you” (plural) – and not individually.

The similarity between Job’s first answer here and his complaint in Job 3 is remarkable. However, in his reply to Eliphaz, he is more controlled. He also elaborates on more things. But the burden is the same and also here he expresses his longing for death. There is no trace of hope.

This first answer, which includes Job 6-7, is divided into two parts. In Job 6 he addresses his friends, first making a general complaint (Job 6:1-13), without addressing the three friends directly. In Job 7 he speaks to God. The answer can be divided as follows:

1. The heaviness and reality of his suffering (Job 6:1-7).

2. The desire to be killed by God (Job 6:8-13).

3. The uselessness of his friends (Job 6:14-23).

4. He challenges his friends to test him (Job 6:24-30).

5. The brevity of life (Job 7:1-11).

6. God is his enemy (Job 7:12-19).

7. His appeal in view of sin (Job 7:20-21).

The Heaviness of His Suffering

Despite all the falsehood hidden behind Eliphaz’s right words, Job has allowed him to finish speaking, and has not interrupted him. When Eliphaz has come to the end of his speech, assured that nothing can be said against it, it turns out that Job is far from convinced. Job’s reaction is introduced with the words “then Job answered” (Job 6:1). These words are the introduction of Job’s reply to the speech of one of the friends each time. Job answers, although he does not address Eliphaz directly in his reaction here.

Eliphaz has reproached Job for succumbing to his suffering (Job 4:5). In response, Job asks that his grief should be actually weighed, i.e. taken seriously (Job 6:2). Eliphaz says it so easily, but he is not affected by what was done to Job. A great amount of misery has come upon him that cannot be expressed in weight. He has been buried under it. One after the other misery has fallen upon him. It should be put together in the balances. The picture here is of a balance with two scales. On one of them, the misery and suffering of Job are piled up. Job shows its great collective weight.

All his accumulated misery is heavier than the sand of the seas (Job 6:3). Is it any wonder, then, that the heaviness of his suffering has led him to ill-considered statements? It sounds like an apology, because he did not make incorrect or rash statements.

But is it not the case that this can happen to anyone who suffers great suffering? We will have to learn to understand such ill-considered statements and not give our cold judgment about them. At the same time, we may think of a man who has also suffered enormously, but speaks of this as “momentary, light affliction”. He was able to do so because he saw “an eternal weight of glory far beyond all comparison” (2Cor 4:17). Paul, for he says this, saw the glorified Lord above the circumstances. Job does not know this. For the Lord Jesus it is even more true that He was looking at the joy set before Him (Heb 12:2).

There is something even more important to Job than physical suffering, and that is the awareness of the arrows of God, “the Almighty”, that hit him (Job 6:4; cf. Job 16:12-13). Arrows cause intense, burning pain. He feels he is the target of the Almighty, against Whom no one can stand. This is the first time that Job blames God for his suffering (Job 7:11-21 ; Job 9:13-35 ; Job 13:15-28).

There is no other option for him than to drink “their poison” with his spirit. This is how he experiences what God is doing to him. God is his enemy Who arrays the misery that has come upon him as an ordered army against him. What can he do about it? God is so powerful, so capable of arraying His horrors. No resistance is possible against that.

We know that Job’s view of God is wrong, but Job does not know what we may know and can know (Jam 1:2; 2Cor 4:16-18). He does not know God as his loving Father. But even though we know this, we sometimes forget it. When our circumstances fill our field of vision, we don’t rise above them. Only if we can focus our eye on the glorified Christ and the loving Father heart it is possible to glory in tribulation (Rom 5:3).

In pictorial language, Job points out what some animals let hear when they eat, or better what they don’t let hear when they eat. An animal – a “wild donkey”, or an “ox” – that gets good food is satisfied, you don’t hear it (Job 6:5). Job, however, is served disasters on the dinner table of his life, and this in a very varied composition. How could he be satisfied with that and be quiet! After all, you don’t eat disgusting food without grumbling. Job cannot see his suffering or the words of his friends as pleasant food. If it were tasty food, he would not complain.

But what is placed before him is an extraordinarily tasteless menu (Job 6:6). “The white of an egg” can also be translated as “a disgusting tasting slime of a certain plant”. It’s not attractive in any way. It lacks ingredients that would make it tasty and edible. He refuses to touch that menu, let alone eat it (Job 6:7). Just the sight of it makes him sick. Job just refuses to live such a life.

Here, Job does not speak the language of faith, that is to say of confidence, as we see, for example, in Paul. Paul was well pleased with what happened to him in insults and suffering for Christ (2Cor 12:10). Job needs light and must learn to trust God, even where he cannot understand Him. We, at least most of us, have to learn that as well.