2 Kings 1
Book of 2 Kings — Quick facts:Purpose: To clarify why both Israel and Judah were experiencing exile from the Promised Land
Author: Unknown
Date: Records events that occurred around 853–586 BC
Setting: Continues the story from 1 Kings of the divided kingdom, ending with both kingdoms experiencing exile
Book of Kings — Overview:
Setting
The book of 2 Kings continues the story of Israel’s divided monarchy, picking up where 1 Kings ends, with Ahaziah reigning over the northern kingdom of Israel and Jehoshaphat ruling in the southern kingdom of Judah. The account traces the fortunes of the two kingdoms to their respective ends—the northern kingdom in 722 BC, the southern kingdom in 586 BC.
Summary
The book of 2 Kings is structured around the reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah. Four different periods are covered: (1) the closing years of the northern kingdom’s third dynasty (853–841 BC, 1:1–9:37 a), (2) the era of the northern kingdom’s fourth dynasty (841–752 BC, 10:1–15:12 b), (3) the period of the northern kingdom’s decline and fall (752–722 BC, 15:13–17:41 c), and (4) the final era of the southern kingdom (722–586 BC, 18:1–25:30 d).
The book begins with an accident that caused the death of King Ahaziah of Israel (1:1-18 e) and with the closing event of Elijah’s life, when God took him into heaven (2:1-12 f). The prophetic mantle passed to Elisha, whose miracles and advice occupy the next several chapters (2:12–8:15 g; see 9:1-10 h).
The reigns of kings Jehoram and Ahaziah of Judah (8:16-29 i) bring the account to the pivotal year of 841 BC, when Jehu killed kings Joram and Ahaziah. Jehu also executed Jezebel, the surviving members of Ahab’s family, and the officials who worshiped Baal (9:11–10:29 j). So Jehu’s twenty-eight-year reign began (10:30-36 k). At the same time Athaliah (11:1-20 l) usurped the throne of Judah and reigned for six years until those loyal to David’s line installed young Joash as king (12:1-21 m).
The twin kingdoms enjoyed prosperity for a time (14:23–15:7 n), but the northern kingdom continued to do evil and entered its decline: Zechariah’s assassination (15:8-12 o) was followed by the short reigns of Shallum, Menahem, Pekahiah, Pekah, and Hoshea (15:13–17:2 p). Hoshea, Israel’s last king (732–722 BC), foolishly placed his confidence in Egypt and rebelled against Assyria, bringing about the capture of Samaria and the end of the northern kingdom in 722 BC (17:3-6 q). The author then evaluates the reasons for Israel’s fall and gives an account of Samaria’s repopulation (17:7-41 r).
The final section of 2 Kings (18:1–25:30 s) deals with the fortunes of Judah. Hezekiah is remembered for trusting the Lord while under pressure (18:5-6 t; see 18:13–20:11 u), and Josiah earns praise for his devotion to the law of the Lord (23:19 v; see 22:8–23:25 w). However, even these two kings made critical mistakes (20:12-19 x; 23:29-30 y; see 2 Chr 35:20-25 z).
Following Josiah’s death, the final kings of Judah did what was evil in the Lord’s sight, and the southern kingdom was ravaged and finally destroyed by King Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon (2 Kgs 23:31–25:21 aa). God’s prophesied judgment had come (see Jer 38:17-23 ab), and the glorious kingdom of Israel passed into the realm of memory.
The book of 2 Kings closes with two appended notes. The first deals with events in Judah after the fall of Jerusalem (2 Kgs 25:22-26 ac). The second describes the later release of Jehoiachin in Babylon (25:27-30 ad).
Authorship and Date
The book of 2 Kings is a continuation of 1 Kings, written by the same author, whose precise identity is unknown. He was well acquainted with sources that enabled him to compose a detailed history of Israel’s divided monarchy, and he had insight to evaluate the reasons for successes and failures on the basis of the people’s response to the Mosaic covenant. His intimate acquaintance with Judah’s later history indicates that he may have lived in or near Jerusalem and may have been an eyewitness to many of the events that brought about the city’s fall. Whether he was still alive to write the final appendix about Jehoiachin’s release (561 BC, 25:25-30 ae) is uncertain. If not, these verses were added by someone well acquainted with 2 Kings and of a kindred spirit with the primary writer. One tradition holds that the single author of 1–2 Kings was Jeremiah and that he was taken to Babylon during Nebuchadnezzar’s return from a campaign in Egypt (around 568 BC) and lived there well into his nineties.
Based on information in the closing chapters, the final composition of 2 Kings most likely took place shortly after the fall of Jerusalem in 586 BC, with the final appendix to the book added shortly after Nebuchadnezzar II’s death in 562 BC.
Chronology
Second Kings is filled with chronological information about the kings of Israel and Judah, but none of this information gives us absolute dates. We obtain absolute dates by comparing Israel’s records with the records of surrounding nations (Assyria, Babylon, and Egypt) and with astronomical calculations. Remarkable harmony is found among the records, which serves as evidence that Israel’s accounts are historically accurate and precise.
Meaning and Message
Each king of the divided monarchy is evaluated on the basis of his faithfulness (or lack thereof) to God. They either “did what was pleasing in the Lord’s sight” or “did what was evil in the Lord’s sight.”
The kings of Israel were consistently evil. They “followed the example of Jeroboam son of Nebat, continuing the sins that Jeroboam had led Israel to commit” (13:2 af, 11 ag; 14:24 ah; 15:9 ai; 17:2 aj). Many of the kings of Judah receive similar censure (see e.g., 8:18 ak). Manasseh, in particular, is condemned for his rampant idolatry and apostasy (21:2-9 al), and his example is followed by several kings after him (21:20 am; 23:32 an, 37 ao; 24:9 ap, 19 aq).
Several kings of Judah are commended, however, for doing “what was pleasing in the Lord’s sight” (12:2 ar; 14:3 as; 15:3 at, 34 au; 18:3 av; 22:2 aw). Such men were concerned for the upkeep and repair of the Temple (12:6-16 ax; 22:3-7 ay) and for obedience to the precepts of God’s word (18:6 az; 22:8-13 ba; 23:1-3 bb). Hezekiah and Josiah receive special commendation: Hezekiah for his trust in the Lord and his honoring of God’s word (18:5-6 bc), and Josiah for his high regard for the law of Moses (23:25 bd). The implication is clear. God’s people are to live in accord with the high standards of God’s word so that they may do what is “pleasing in God’s sight” (cp. Ps 119:9-11 be, 111 bf; 2 Tim 3:16-17 bg).
The prominence given to the final days of the great prophet Elijah (1:3-17 bh; 2:1-11 bi) and to Elisha’s spectacular ministry (2:12-25 bj; 3:11-19 bk; 4:1–7:2 bl; 8:1-2 bm) emphasizes the need to proclaim God’s words to others (Acts 20:18-21 bn; 2 Tim 2:15 bo; 4:2 bp) so that they may come into covenant relationship with the Lord (2 Cor 3:4-6 bq).
Finally, the failures of even the good kings remind God’s people to steadfastly be faithful to the Lord and serve him. Then their lives can be filled with good (Ps 84:11 br; Rom 14:7-8 bs), and when they stand before God for judgment (Rom 14:10-11 bt; 2 Cor 5:10 bu), he will reward and praise them (2 Tim 4:7-8 bv; Rev 2:10 bw; see Matt 25:23 bx).
1:1 by After Ahab’s death, the Moabites felt secure enough to declare themselves free of their Israelite overlords (see 3:4-5 bz). The historical notice anticipates the troubles that Israel would experience after the short-lived reign of Ahaziah (see 1 Kgs 22:51 ca).
1:2 cb An upper room or balcony enclosed with latticework was common; it allowed for the free flow of air and a degree of privacy, but latticework was easily broken.
• Baal-zebub (lord of flies) may be a parody of a Canaanite deity named Baal-zebul (Baal is prince). The name of this deity was later used for Satan (see study note on Matt 10:25). Ahaziah followed his father Ahab in worshiping Baal.
Summary for 2Kgs 1:3-4: 1:3-4 cc The angel of the Lord does not seem to be a christophany in the book of Kings, as in other Old Testament texts (e.g., Judg 6:11-18 cd).
• Elijah, who had previously confronted Ahaziah’s father, Ahab, had a twofold message for the king: a condemnation for failure to acknowledge that Yahweh, not Baal, is God (see 1 Kgs 18:16-18 ce), and a pronouncement of doom (see 1 Kgs 21:17-24 cf).
Summary for 2Kgs 1:9-10: 1:9-10 cg The arrogant words of the army captain contained a contradiction, which Elijah pointed out: If Elijah was a man of God (i.e., God’s prophet), then his authority was from God and to ignore him was to invite peril (Deut 18:15-19 ch).
• Fire often symbolizes the presence of God in the Scriptures (see Exod 3:1-6 ci; 19:18 cj; cp. 1 Kgs 18:38 ck).
• Fifty soldiers was a common grouping (1 Kgs 18:4 cl); here it indicates a division within Israel’s military organization.
Summary for 2Kgs 1:11-13: 1:11-13 cm Report of what happened to the previous contingent had apparently reached the king.
Summary for 2Kgs 1:13-14: 1:13-14 cn In contrast to the first two officers, the third commander pleaded for mercy before Elijah and God.
1:15 co When the angel of the Lord (1:3 cp) instructed Elijah, he responded in faithful obedience.
1:16 cq Is there no God in Israel? God’s message to Ahaziah remained unchanged (cp. 1:3-4 cr).
1:17 cs The second year of the reign of Jehoram was 852 BC, during Jehoram’s co-regency with his father, Jehoshaphat (853–848 BC).
Copyright information for
TNotes