Acts 25:13-22
Summary for Acts 25:13-22: 25:13-22 a Festus discussed Paul’s case with Herod Agrippa II (ruled AD 50–100), who had come to Caesarea to make a courtesy call on the new governor.25:16 b It was a fundamental principle: Roman law did not convict people without a trial. They must be given an opportunity to confront their accusers and defend themselves (cp. 19:38-39 c). This put Roman judicial procedure in a favorable light for readers of Acts.
25:17 d I didn’t delay: In contrast with Felix, his predecessor (24:22-27 e).
Summary for Acts 25:18-20: 25:18-20 f These verses give Festus’s official reasons for his actions; see also 25:9 g. There were no criminal accusations against Paul; the objections were about their religion and centered on Paul’s claim that Jesus ... is alive.
Copyright information for
TNotes