Mar 14:63-64 | TNotes | STEP | Summary for Mark 14:63-64: 14:63-64 The high priest tore his clothing at Jesus’ response. This was a judicial act that indicated a guilty verdict and signified that there was no need to find other witnesses. The rest of the Sanhedrin agreed that Jesus was guilty and deserved to die. • Exactly what was blasphemous in Jesus’ reply is unclear. Perhaps it was his reply “ I Am ,” which was the way God referred to himself in Exod 3:14 (see John 8:58 ). However, Mark is not necessarily repeating the actual words Jesus said at his trial (cp. Matt 26:64 ; Luke 22:70 ), so these words could simply be indicating Jesus’ affirmative response to the high priest’s question. He was the Messiah, the Son of God. During the second Jewish revolt against Rome, Bar Kokhba ( AD 132–135) claimed to be the Messiah, and it was not considered blasphemous. Jesus’ identification of himself as the Son of Man cannot have been considered blasphemous, for we have over fifty instances before Jesus’ trial in which he used this title, and the charge of blasphemy was never raised. Yet it was too much for the high priest and the Sanhedrin when Jesus clearly claimed to be the Son of Man of Dan 7:13 coming in God’s name to judge the world. This declaration was also added to the fact that, during his ministry, Jesus forgave sins (Mark 2:5-7 ; Luke 7:48-50 ), claimed to be the Son of God (Mark 12:6 ), pronounced judgment upon the Temple (14:58 ), and claimed to be Lord of the Sabbath (2:28 ). Already convinced that Jesus should be put to death, the religious leaders now pronounced the predetermined guilty verdict (14:55 ).

a14:63-64►

bExod 3:14►

cJohn 8:58►

dMatt 26:64►

eLuke 22:70►

fDan 7:13►

gMark 2:5-7►

hLuke 7:48-50►

iMark 12:6►

j14:58►

k2:28►

l14:55►

‏ Mark 14:63-64

Summary for Mark 14:63-64: 14:63-64 ^a The high priest tore his clothing at Jesus’ response. This was a judicial act that indicated a guilty verdict and signified that there was no need to find other witnesses. The rest of the Sanhedrin agreed that Jesus was guilty and deserved to die.

• Exactly what was blasphemous in Jesus’ reply is unclear. Perhaps it was his reply “I Am,” which was the way God referred to himself in Exod 3:14 ^b (see John 8:58 ^c). However, Mark is not necessarily repeating the actual words Jesus said at his trial (cp. Matt 26:64 ^d; Luke 22:70 ^e), so these words could simply be indicating Jesus’ affirmative response to the high priest’s question. He was the Messiah, the Son of God. During the second Jewish revolt against Rome, Bar Kokhba (AD 132–135) claimed to be the Messiah, and it was not considered blasphemous. Jesus’ identification of himself as the Son of Man cannot have been considered blasphemous, for we have over fifty instances before Jesus’ trial in which he used this title, and the charge of blasphemy was never raised. Yet it was too much for the high priest and the Sanhedrin when Jesus clearly claimed to be the Son of Man of Dan 7:13 ^f coming in God’s name to judge the world. This declaration was also added to the fact that, during his ministry, Jesus forgave sins (Mark 2:5-7 ^g; Luke 7:48-50 ^h), claimed to be the Son of God (Mark 12:6 ⁱ), pronounced judgment upon the Temple (14:58 ^j), and claimed to be Lord of the Sabbath (2:28 ^k). Already convinced that Jesus should be put to death, the religious leaders now pronounced the predetermined guilty verdict (14:55 ^l).